|
Princeton
Geoscience was hired to evaluate the source of radioactivity in the water
supply of a condominium development in northwestern New Jersey and to
recommend alternatives for mitigation of the problem. Groundwater
withdrawn from the water supply system exhibited radium-(226+228) and
gross alpha activity in excess of the federal Maximum Contaminant Limit (MCL)
a. The NJDEP-Bureau of Safe Drinking Water required correction of the
violation.
The site is located in a geologically complex area of the State, in which
naturally elevated background radioactivity had been documented
previously. Because a natural source for the observed groundwater
radioactivity was suspected, investigative activities focused on the
identification of site-specific conditions contributing to radioactivity
in the ground-water supply. The client indicated a desire to avoid the
need for disposal of contaminated water treatment wastes (e.g., filtration
media), so mitigation strategies were aimed at development of a modified
or alternate supply that would comply with MCLs without treatment for
removal of radioactivity.
Specific
activities completed by Princeton Geoscience included reviewing published
maps of bedrock and surface geology, determining well construction and
pumping schedule, inspection of geologic conditions at and adjacent to the
property and consultation with the New Jersey Geological Survey. Based on
these activities, We determined that several geologic conditions may
contribute radioactivity to groundwater. These include radioactive
minerals associated with hornblende granite and (to a much lesser extent)
microcline gneiss bedrock units at the site, and faults identified within
the radioactive mineral-bearing rock masses. The faults and other bedrock
fractures can function as sources, because radioactive minerals dissolved
from the adjacent rock can co-precipitate with iron minerals along the
fracture surfaces or may be concentrated due to volume reduction along
shear zones. Other geologic units in the area, including the Franklin
Marble and surface sand, silt and gravel of glacial origin, do not contain
significant radioactive mineral assemblages and do not contribute
significantly to the observed groundwater radioactivity.
Based on
these findings, Princeton Geoscience identified three alternatives for
modifications to the water supply system, including:
Alternative A
- Modifying the construction of the existing well, to allow water entry only
from low-radioactivity fracture zones (if such zones exist), following
geophysical logging of the well
Alternative B -
Installing a new well in the bedrock at an alternate location on the property
(or to greater depth), where zones of radioactive ground-water are less likely
to be encountered, if Alternative A cannot be implemented
Alternative C -
Installing a new well in the glacial deposits on the property, if Alternatives A
and B cannot be implemented
Alternative
C was considered least favorable because it was unclear whether a glacial
aquifer of sufficient saturated thickness to provide a yield adequate for the
needs of the complex was present, and the only feasible locations for a well in
the glacial deposits were distant from the condominium buildings and water
distribution system. Alternative B was recommended only as a contingency should
Alternative A prove infeasible, due to the greater cost and complexity
associated with Alternative B.
For the geophysical logging under Alternative A, we noted that the most useful
logs would likely be caliper, neutron density and temperature (for
identification of water-bearing fracture zones) and natural gamma (for
determining gross lithology changes (e.g., marble vs. gneiss) and identifying
highly radioactive zones). An oriented borehole televiewer or video log would
also be useful in estimating fracture orientation.
Princeton
Geoscience noted that if significant fractured intervals with low radioactivity
are found, the existing well could be modified by grouting off the zones which
contribute radioactive water to the well (fractured intervals with high gamma
response). If the “clean” zones are near the top of the well, the lower
radioactive zones could simply be grouted using a tremie pipe. For sealing off
shallow radioactive zones underlain by zones of clean water-producing fractures,
Princeton Geoscience recommended pressure grouting using a pneumatic packer
assembly.
|