|
Princeton
Geoscience evaluated groundwater monitoring data from nine quarterly
sampling events as part of a natural attenuation monitoring program
initiated by another consultant. This included developing a new
conceptual model of site hydrogeologic conditions; further assessing
groundwater geochemistry and potential impacts to receptors; determining
site-specific contaminant degradation half-lives; application of several
groundwater models (BIOCHLOR, Disperse and site-specific calculations);
and development of a proposed Classification Exception Area (CEA) and
monitoring program.
Based on results of these activities, Princeton
Geoscience determined that some degree of source treatment and groundwater
remediation is necessary. A remedial program has been developed which
includes a supplemental evaluation of the source area (former vapor
degreaser location) and a focused application of enhanced, in-situ
bioremediation. Regenesis Bioremediation Products, Inc.’s Hydrogen
Release Compound (HRC) will be injected into the subsurface at the former
release area, to enhance the reductive dehalogenation processes currently
taking place. A groundwater monitoring program will be performed to
evaluate the effectiveness of the remedy and determine when benchmarks for
switching to monitored natural attenuation have been achieved.
An important aspect of this project has been
completing activities required under New Jersey’s Industrial Site Recovery
Act, within the financial constraints of the former property owners
responsible for the cleanup. Princeton Geoscience was initially informed
by the client and their attorney that attempts to recover costs through
the client’s former insurer had determined that no financial relief was
possible, because the insurance company was no longer in business. For
this reason, the client (a retired individual) had been paying project
costs personally since the mid-1990s. Princeton Geoscience discussed the
case with several attorneys and identified a firm willing to pursue
insurance reimbursement on a contingency basis.
Working
with Princeton Geoscience, the firm obtained proof of past insurance
coverage. The successor to the client’s insurance company has since
acknowledged the coverage and agreed to pay past and future costs
associated with the groundwater remediation project.
Because the outcome of the insurance cost
recovery efforts was initially uncertain, Princeton Geoscience also
pursued grant and loan funds for the project through New Jersey’s
Hazardous Site Discharge Remediation Fund (HSDRF). Grants are being
pursued for both Innovative Technology and Innocent Purchaser funds.
Innovative Technologies proposed for use on the project include the HRC
treatments and the source evaluation, which will be consistent with
components of USEPA’s Triad Approach. An Innocent Purchaser grant is
being sought to recover costs for previous and required future remediation
of contaminants not believed to have been present in the client’s waste
stream. Specifically, a distinction has been made between the type of
solvent used by the client during their operation of the site in the 1980s
(1,1,1 trichloroethane (TCA)) and those used during plating and metal
working operations over a 25-year period by previous site owners
(including perchloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE)). The main
impact to ground water at the site is currently associated with PCE, TCE
and their degradation products.
NJDEP has approved the
proposed source evaluation and remedial approach and is currently
reviewing the HDSRF application. Upon determination of the client’s
eligibility for HDSRF funds, a mechanism for apportioning costs between
insurance and grant reimbursement sources will be developed and the
proposed project activities implemented.
|